Non-traditional alternatives
There are three non-traditional approaches to NAS consolidation: clustered
file systems, parallel file systems and NAS aggregators. Many vendors tout
their NAS gateways as a means of providing independent performance
scaling for both the back- and front-end. Some non-traditional alternatives
take this a step further by allowing not just a scale-up of performance in
the front end (by increasing node horsepower), but a scale-out of the front
end by adding multiple independent nodes that can access the same
single namespace.
Clustered and parallel file systems: Clustered file systems operate
across multiple nodes (generally more than eight) and use off-the-shelf
hardware and/ or standard operating system software. The nodes can be
specialized, such as meta data nodes and storage nodes, or generic,
supporting both meta data and storage services. Some products
mentioned in the previous sections support from two to eight NAS box
clusters for high availability. However, none of the products previously
mentioned does this to quite the extent available from clustered or parallel
file-system products. A true clustered or parallel file system scales
performance linearly as the number of nodes increases and provides
access to the same data across all nodes.
Clustered file systems are good for companies with large compute clusters
that need high-performance access to file-system data. One key
advantage of these products is that performance can be dialed up almost
as high as you want by adding nodes to the cluster. However, these
products may not be as useful for Windows users, as some have limited
(or no) support for CIFS, but this is vendor-specific.
Kommentare zu diesen Handbüchern